Space Travel News  
Russia Destroys Chemical Weapons On Schedule

Stocks of Yperite, or mustard gas, is amongst the chemical agents that Russia has recently destroyed.
by Viktor Litovkin
RIA Novosti military commentator
Moscow (RIA Novosti) Mar 27, 2007
The executive council of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) met in The Hague in the middle of March. It reviewed the obligations that had been fulfilled in 2006 by signatories to the Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and made plans for the future. The meeting was also attended by a Russian delegation, which had many things to report to those in attendance.

By the beginning of the conference, Russia had destroyed 7,007.5 metric tons of its chemical weapons stocks, or 17.5% of their total declared amount, which is 40,000 metric tons. The figure also includes 1,143.2 metric tons of yperite and lewisite in Gorny, Saratov Region, which effectively eliminated what remained of that city's chemical weapons stocks.

The detoxification of chemical weapons is continuing at two other facilities in Russia. One is located in Kambarka, Udmurtia, and its capacity for processing lewisite is 9.6 metric tons a day. Total stores of this blister agent there are 6,300 metric tons. The second is in Maradykovsky, Kirov Region, which neutralizes aviation ammunition filled with VX-type gases. It has 4,013.5 metric tons, or 19,657 units of storage.

The process involves pouring a special reagent into the cases to turn the chemicals into a reactive mass which is then removed from the steel shells (to date this has been done to 13,371 submunitions, or 2,899.6 metric tons). The cases are then rinsed, flame-cleaned, and crushed. The mass is also water washed and sent on to high-temperature furnaces for further treatment. In the end it loses every trace of ever having been a deadly poison.

Viktor Kholstov, deputy head of the Federal Industrial Agency responsible for the safe and timely destruction of chemical weapons in Russia, believes that if this measured pace is kept up, then by April 29, 2007, the tenth anniversary of Russia's accession to the convention, the country will have fulfilled or even surpassed its commitments by eliminating just over 20% of its stocks, or, more precisely, 8553.4 metric tons of toxic agents.

By the same date in 2009, however, Russia is to destroy 45% of its stocks. And by April 29, 2012, it is to report to the OPCW in The Hague that it has destroyed them all. Will it be able to do so? In addition to Gorny, Kambarka and Maradykovsky, there are four more sites with toxic chemicals. These are Kizner in Udmurtia, Leonidovka in the Penza Region, Pochep in the Bryansk Region and Shchuchye in the Kurgan Region. How are things going there?

According to Kholstov, all documents have been prepared, feasibility studies made, and detoxification facilities built. Immediate plans include launching a facility in Leonidovka, one in Pochep and one in Shchuchye. However, under a state program for the destruction of chemical weapons, a facility to dispose of nerve gases stored in the Kurgan Region (5,462 tonnes of sarin, soman and VX gases, or 13.6% of all Russian gases, or just 9,382 carloads) was to have come online ahead of the one in Maradykovsky. But, as much as I hate to say it, Moscow was let down by its partners in Washington under the cooperative threat-reduction program.

The U.S. government promised more than $880 million for the Shchuchye facility when Bill Clinton was still president. But time and time again reasons were found to delay the financial and material aid or cut it down to the bone. First, Washington demanded that Moscow should speedily provide social amenities for the staff: clinics, kindergartens, schools and other public buildings. When that was all done, new requests were put forward that had not been mentioned in any joint documents, something like information about binary chemical weapons or access to institutes doing biological research.

Russia had to rely on its own efforts to meet the deadlines. The priority that had at first been given to Shchuchye as central to fulfilling the convention had to be refocused on the other facilities, including those in Kambarka and Maradykovsky. Shchuchye was allowed to lapse a few years. Now it is being brought up to date, but exclusively with Russian money and thanks to assistance from countries other than the United States.

Other countries helping Russia destroy its chemical arms quickly and safely deserve a special mention. The group is spearheaded by Germany, followed by Switzerland, the Netherlands, Italy, Canada and others. And although their contribution is not more than 10%, Russian specialists would have found it hard to get rid of the poisonous weapons of the Cold War without their partnership. There is no longer any doubt that they will be totally demolished - and on time, in accordance with the schedule set by the OPCW.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

Source: RIA Novosti

Related Links
Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
News and analysis about the Global War Against Terror at SpaceWar.com
The Long War - Doctrine and Application



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Second Witness Reveals Much In Plame Leak Controversy
Washington (UPI) March 26, 2007
Despite the hype surrounding the first public appearance by Valerie Plame Wilson last week, the testimony that was most indicting of the Bush administration's handling of the CIA leak controversy came not from the former CIA agent but from the second witness: a White House official responsible for carrying out internal White House investigations.







  • Worldwide Testing And ISS Traffic Push ATV Launch To Autumn 2007
  • SpaceX Confirms Stage Bump On Demoflight 2
  • Falcon 1 Video Suggests Stage Collision
  • SpaceX Set To Try Again Today

  • ISRO To Launch Foreign Satellite As Primary Payload First Time
  • Arianespace Is Ready To Support The Mobile Satellite Services Industry's Future Development
  • Next Ariane 5 Takes Shape
  • Official Opening Of The Soyuz Launch Base Construction Site In French Guiana

  • NASA Assigns Crew For Shuttle Mission To Install Japanese Lab
  • Shuttle Atlantis Grounded by Fuel Tank Damage
  • Marshall Communications And AMERICOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES Extend NASA Contract
  • Shuttle's External Tank Inspection And Repairs Continue

  • Soyuz TMA-9 Module Relocation Set For March 30
  • MDA To Implement Space Station Berthing Information Solution For Japan
  • ISS Crew Work On Long-Dusration Space Flight Tests
  • Expedition 15 To ISS Approved Soyuz TMA-10 To Launch April 7

  • New Mexico Voters Weigh Spaceport Tax Impost
  • The First Soyuz Mission Forty Years On
  • Researchers Uncover Protection Mechanism Of Radiation-Resistant Bacterium
  • Russia To Launch International Space Lab In 2011

  • China Outlines Space Program Till 2010
  • China To Launch New Direct Broadcast Satellite To Replace SinoSat-2
  • Russian Court Upholds Custody For Space Firm Chief Reshetin
  • China Unveils New Space Science Plan

  • Students Rack Up Wins At Local Robotics Competition
  • Talking Bots
  • Novel Salamander Robot Crawls Its Way Up The Evolutionary Ladder
  • Look Ma, No Hands, No Humans

  • International Partnerships Plan Continued Exploration Of Mars
  • Mechanized Explorers Study The Depths, Chemistry Of Mars
  • NASA Scientists And Teachers To Study Mars In The Mojave Desert
  • Spirit Loses And Then Re-Establishes Contact with Orbiter

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement