New research suggests it wasn't superior intelligence that set our earliest pre-human ancestors, like Australopithecus, apart from apes.

For the study, scientists analyzed holes in the skull that allow the passage of supply arteries to the brain, calculating blood flow to the cognitive part of the brain. Researchers calibrated their estimates using humans and other mammal models, and then applied their calculations to 96 great ape skulls and 11 Australopithecus fossil skulls.

The data -- published Wednesday in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B -- showed modern apes benefit from greater blood flow to their brain's cognitive regions than Australopithecus.

Australopithecus, the species responsible for the famed "Lucy" fossil, had a larger brain than apes. Anthropologists have long assumed larger brains yielded greater cognitive functionality and superior intelligence, but the latest findings suggest otherwise.

"At first, brain size seems reasonable because it is a measure of the number of brain cells, called neurons," Roger Seymour, professor of biological sciences at the University of Adelaide in Australia, said in a news release. "On second thought, however, cognition relies not only on the number of neurons, but also on the number of connections between them, called synapses. These connections govern the flow of information within the brain and greater synaptic activity results in greater information processing."

Synaptic activity fuels the human brain's powerful cognitive abilities, and synaptic activity requires a lot of energy and significant blood supply. The human body has evolved to deliver 15 to 20 percent of its energy to the brain. Additionally, 15 percent of the blood pumped by the heart is directed to the brain.

Through the years, apes have proven capable of impressive cognitive feats. The famous gorilla Koko learned sign language, comprehending more than 1,000 signs. Kanzi, a bonobo, learned English comprehension and syntax, and also built stone tools.

With a brain equal to and bigger than such apes, researchers assumed Lucy and her relatives were smarter.

"It is known that the large human brain looks like a scaled-up primate brain in terms of size and neuron number," Seymour said. "However, the study shows that cerebral blood flow rate of human ancestors falls well below the data derived from modern, non-human primates."

The latest research suggests great apes like Koko received about twice as much blood flow as Lucy to the cerebral hemispheres.

"Because blood flow rate might be better measure of information processing capacity than brain size alone, Koko seems to have been smarter," Seymour said.

Related Links
All About Human Beings and How We Got To Be Here

Tweet

Thanks for being here; We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain. With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords. Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year. If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor $5 Billed Once credit card or paypal		SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter $5 Billed Monthly paypal only

Early Rome featured a surprising amount of genetic diversity
Washington (UPI) Nov 8, 2019
During its long history, Rome has been shaped by a tremendous amount of genetic diversity. It was, new research suggests, one of the earliest urban melting pots. To better understand how the genetic makeup of people in Rome and surrounding regions were influenced by centuries of migration, as well as the Roman Empire's geopolitical expansion, researchers collected and analyzed 127 DNA samples from 29 Roman and Italian archaeological sites dating from the Stone Age through the Middle Ages. ... read more