 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Resilience In The Face Of Sustained Cyber Attack Part Three
Washington (UPI) Feb 19, 2009 Efforts to safeguard the U.S. homeland tend to focus solely on the unrealistic task of protecting infrastructure. However, the politically charged "failure is not an option" approach to classify all infrastructure as "critical" is detrimental to prioritizing national security missions. Instead, the United States needs leaders who understand the need for creating and implementing strategies of resiliency, or methods for ensuring that basic structures and systems of global, national and local economies remain strong even after a cyberattack, other malicious acts or acts of war, as James Jay Carafano pointed out in his paper "Resiliency and Public-Private Partnerships to Enhance Homeland Security," Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 2150, published June 24, 2008, at http://www.heritage.org/Research/HomelandDefense/bg2150.cfm. A strategy of resiliency does not mean abandonment of preventive measures. At its core, resiliency is far more complex -- and effective -- than simply protecting critical infrastructure against natural and man-made threats. Protection alone cedes the initiative to the enemy. The United States needs cyber-strategic leaders. Because of the vulnerability of cyberspace, one initiative that should be prominent in constructing a resiliency strategy for the 21st century is a cyber-strategic leadership program. Cyber-strategic leadership is not a specific technical skill or person, but a set of knowledge, skills and attributes essential to all leaders at all levels of government and in the private sector. The recipe of education, assignment and accreditation that worked so successfully following the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986 can also be used to foster critical interagency skills among national security professionals. No institutions in Washington, academia or elsewhere in the United States are currently designed to carry out such a task. A national effort with national standards should be initiated, and a new government institution to help foster interagency learning should be built in Washington, D.C. This professional development program could integrate a shared body of common knowledge, practices and experiences, as well as trust and confidence among practitioners. Among the skills and attributes this institution could provide would be an expertise in the cyber environment, risk management, best practices, effective interagency cooperation and public-private partnerships. Just as senior leaders in government and the private sector are expected to have an understanding of accounting and information technology, a working knowledge of cybersecurity must also become commonplace. (Part 4: Creating the curriculum and training program to prepare the required new generation of cyber-strategic leaders in the United States) (James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., is assistant director of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies and senior research fellow for national security and homeland security in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, a division of the Davis Institute, at The Heritage Foundation. Eric Sayers is a research assistant in the Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation.) (United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.) Related Links Resiliency and Public-Private Partnerships to Enhance Homeland Security Cyberwar - Internet Security News - Systems and Policy Issues
The Silent Cyberwar Growing Ever More Dangerous
Washington (UPI) Feb 17, 2009 Cyberwarfare is being waged on a massive scale the world over. Ostensibly friendly nations zap each others' electronic nerve cells frequently, and with reckless abandon. On a single day in 2008, the Pentagon was hit by would-be intruders 6 million times in a 24-hour period. Before Sept. 11, 2001, the highest annual figure for cyberattacks against the Pentagon was 250,000. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement |
