 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Northrop Grumman KC-45: Why We Won - Survivability
Washington DC (SPX) May 15, 2008 The U.S. Air Force found Northrop Grumman Corporation's (NYSE:NOC) bid to build the next generation of aerial refueling tankers superior to Boeing's in four of the five most important selection criteria. Despite this fact, the losing bidder wants the Government Accountability Office to overturn the Air Force decision to award the contract to Northrop Grumman even though the Air Force conducted what even Boeing described as a fair, open and transparent bidding process. Here is another reason Northrop Grumman won, drawn from a list of facts included in a redacted version of a protected Air Force selection document.
Survivability Among the requirements: Armor to protect crew members from small arms fire, systems to reduce the risk of fuel tank explosions, long-range threat warning systems with integrated displays, and anti-missile systems designed to thwart surface-to-air missile attacks. Both the KC-45 and the KC-767 will be much more survivable than the KC-135, which today has no self-protection systems. Boeing claims that its proposed aircraft is more survivable, but the fact of the matter is that the Air Force found that Northrop Grumman's KC-45 satisfied the Air Force's overarching survivability Key Performance Parameter requirements and had NO assessed weaknesses. Moreover, additional protective equipment and systems could be added at low risk and cost without reducing the amount of fuel or cargo the KC-45 can deliver. Survivability was not the only criteria, but one of many. The Air Force had to balance survivability against other capabilities, criteria and cost to ensure that our warfighters got the best overall aircraft to execute the mobility mission. The KC-45's unique combination of increased capabilities adds to aircraft survivability and crew safety in other ways. The KC-45's greater range means that it can efficiently and effectively refuel aircraft further from threats to forward bases. Its increased capability means it can accomplish refueling and airlift missions with fewer aircraft in the battle theater. The KC-45's capability to execute tasks more efficiently using fewer aircraft means fewer crewmembers will be placed in harm's way. Related Links Northrop Grumman The latest in Military Technology for the 21st century at SpaceWar.com
Tank Technology Stuck In The 1940s Part Two
Washington (UPI) May 8, 2008 The U.S. Army, which has only the most rudimentary understanding of operational art, has designed its tanks, especially the M-1 Abrams Main Battle Tank, for tactical utility with little thought for operational mobility. (William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation.) |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement |
