Iran held talks on Tuesday with European powers, seeking to avert a sanctions snapback which they have threatened to impose under the moribund 2015 nuclear deal.

Kazem Gharibabadi, an Iranian deputy foreign minister who attended the talks with Britain, France and Germany in Geneva, said in a post on X it was "high time" for the European trio "to make the right choice and give diplomacy time and space".

"It was decided that contacts between the two sides would continue in the coming days," foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told state TV after the talks ended.

The European trio -- parties to the landmark 2015 Iran nuclear deal -- have threatened to trigger the accord's "snapback mechanism" by the end of August.

Tuesday's meeting was the second round of talks with European diplomats since the end of a 12-day war between Iran and Israel in June, triggered by an unprecedented Israeli surprise attack.

That war had derailed Tehran's nuclear negotiations with the United States and prompted Iran to suspend cooperation with the UN's nuclear watchdog.

Baqaei earlier argued that the European powers "do not have the legal and moral" grounds to trigger a snapback, telling reporters that "we will not allow this issue to become a tool of psychological warfare."

The move would reimpose sweeping UN sanctions lifted under the 2015 agreement unless Iran agreed to curb its uranium enrichment and restore cooperation with International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors.

Baqaei told a regular press conference ahead of the Geneva meeting that "our focus is on preventing actions or incidents that may be costly for the country."

The window for activating the snapcback mechanism closes in October -- after which the UN sanctions would be permanently removed -- but according to the Financial Times, the Europeans have suggested pushing back that deadline.

Iran has dismissed the Europeans' right to extend the deadline, and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi recently said Tehran was working with its allies China and Russia to prevent the reimposition of sanctions.

The nuclear deal was torpedoed in 2018 when Donald Trump, during his first term as president, unilaterally withdrew the United States and slapped crippling sanctions on Iran.

Just before the recent war with Israel, Iran held five rounds of talks with the United States with the aim of reaching a new deal on Tehran's nuclear programme.

What is 'snapback'? European nations' Iran sanctions move explained
Vienna (AFP) Aug 26, 2025 -

Britain, France and Germany have threatened to trigger a "snapback mechanism" to reintroduce UN sanctions over Tehran's atomic programme that were lifted under a now moribund 2015 Iran nuclear deal.

The trio -- known as the E3 -- is considering activating the mechanism unless Iran agrees to curb its nuclear programme and restore its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Western powers and Israel have long accused Tehran of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, a claim Iran denies.

AFP explains how the "snapback mechanism" works, as Tehran meets with European powers for talks in Geneva.

- How does the 'snapback' mechanism work? -

In 2015, the E3, together with the United States, China and Russia signed a historic nuclear accord with Iran.

The deal, known officially as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), saw the UN lift international sanctions against Iran in exchange for restrictions on Tehran's nuclear programme.

The agreement was unanimously ratified by the UN Security Council under resolution 2231.

Then-president Barack Obama's administration boasted of having obtained a clause in the agreement that would allow it to reimpose, or "snapback," all sanctions if Iran failed to comply with the agreement.

"It is a unique Security Council measure that has not been used before and once triggered, cannot be reversed," analyst Negar Mortazavi of the Center for International Policy told AFP.

Any state "participating" in the agreement can lodge a complaint with the Security Council if they deem another participant has significantly failed to respect the accord.

That notification starts a 30-day window where the Council must pass a new resolution that would officially lift the sanctions agreed to in resolution 2231.

If the participant that issues the initial complaint wishes instead to reinstate the sanctions, then it can veto the new resolution, thus automatically triggering the "snapback."

The window for activating the mechanism closes on October 18 -- after which the UN sanctions would be permanently removed -- but, according to the Financial Times, the Europeans have suggested pushing back that deadline.

- Why do the European powers want to trigger it? -

In a letter to the UN in mid-August, the E3 slammed Iran for having breached several JCPOA commitments, including building up a uranium stock to more than 40 times the permitted level under the deal.

"We are ready... to notify the significant non-performance of JCPOA commitments by Iran," and thus prepared to "trigger the snapback mechanism" before 31 August, the foreign ministers of France, Britain and Germany wrote in the letter.

By triggering the "snapback" provision by late August, the procedure would be completed before Russia, which has grown closer to Iran since its invasion of Ukraine in 2022, takes over the rotating council presidency in October.

The hard-won 2015 deal has been left in tatters ever since the US, during Donald Trump's first presidency, walked away from it in 2018, and reimposed sanctions on Iran.

Following the US withdrawal, Tehran gradually broke away from its commitments under the agreement and began stepping up its nuclear activities, with tensions high since the 12-day war between Iran and Israel in June.

The war also derailed Tehran's nuclear negotiations with the United States and prompted Iran to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, with inspectors of the Vienna-based UN body leaving the country shortly afterwards.

- What does Iran say? -

During his previous term, Trump attempted to trigger the snapback clause in 2020, but failed due to the country's unilateral withdrawal two years earlier.

While European powers have for years launched repeated efforts to revive the 2015 deal through negotiations and said they "have unambiguous legal grounds" to trigger the clause, Iran does not share their view.

"Tehran sees both the US and by extension Europe in violation of the 2015 deal, while Iran was still abiding by its terms," said Mortazavi.

From Iran's perspective, "the E3 unofficially abandoned it by halting business with Tehran in order to avoid US sanctions".

Moreover, Iran has threatened to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) if the "snapback" is triggered.

- What impact would it have? -

In concrete terms, the three European nations would reimpose "global embargoes on arms, nuclear equipment and banking restrictions that were lifted 10 years ago," said French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot.

Reinstated sanctions will have no "major impact on the Iranian economy, as the country is already among the most-sanctioned in the world," said Mortazavi.

But Tehran wants to avoid such a scenario, which would exacerbate its problems and isolate it even further on the international stage.

Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com