. Space Travel News .




.
MILPLEX
India's military purchases: Only the best should do
by Gulshan Luthra
New Delhi (IANS) Mar 13, 2012

illustration only

The US has reiterated a 2005 offer to share hi-tech in defence with India, although this time it appears to be more meaningful and realistic of India's futuristic requirements.

For instance, the US Department of Defense (DoD) has in a recent report to the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee suggested that "should India indicate interest in the JSF, the United States would be prepared to provide information on the JSF and its requirements (infrastructure, security, etc.) to support India's future planning".

In fact, an indication in this perspective was given by Lockheed Martin's Vice President for Business Development Orville Prins in January 2010 when he told India Strategic defence magazine (www.indiastrategic.in) that a presentation about the JSF was made to the Indian Navy after it expressed interest in the newer generation of aircraft for its future carrier-based aircraft requirements. Although weapon systems are made in the US by leading companies, they are not authorized to even suggest sales unless there are blessings from the State and Defense Departments.

However, there is perhaps not much hope for the JSF unless the Indian government cancels its agreement with Russia for the nascent Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) or decides to go in for both the options, which sounds difficult if not unlikely. The Russians have a tremendous weakness in electronics warfare systems compared to both the Americans and Europeans, and the FGFA's engines are also yet to be developed. At present, the prototypes are using Sukhoi Su-30 engines.

Even with these, the cost for 148 single seat and 48 twin seater FGFAs, now called Perspective Multirole Fighters (PMF), is estimated to be a huge $35 billion.

In this context, it has to be noted that since 2005, when the US had announced a sea change in its foreign policy to assist India become a global power, India has bought or contracted some $10 billion worth of aircraft and systems from the US. Still, there are many critical technologies that India needs and the US has undeniably the best of them thanks to the billions it pours into military R and D.

There are unmanned aircraft, many onboard systems and components like EW systems, combat radars for aircraft, ships, tanks and land vehicles from companies like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Honeywell, Northrop Grumman, Boeing and United Technologies that could be offered to India without strings.

Notably, irrespective of what is sold by the US to India, the official mention of JSF for India, even within its own system, is a powerful indicator of the extent to which the US administration would go in the future. It is in fact a reiteration of the policy adopted and declared by the previous George Bush administration.

For India, there is an opportunity, if the country chooses to go forward in acquiring a quantum jump in technologies.

There is no way that New Delhi would give up its friendly ties with Moscow, but then Russia has limitations. Moscow does not have the sophistication in many systems, it is not able to ensure near-future or lifetime support, and has the negative capability to go back on its own words as it did in the case of aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov.

Reports emanating from Moscow already indicate that India's 2009 proposal to develop a Multi-role Transport Aircraft (MTA) in cooperation with Russian expertise is also in jeopardy with the Russians already demanding more money and less involvement.

India would need to balance friendship with Russia and the latter's inability to support India's modernisation programmes. Russia has to accede to its weaknesses and admit them in all fairness. And thanks to the need to phase out the large Soviet-vintage inventory in the Indian Army, Navy and Air Force, India can still continue to buy some systems from Russia and some highly sophisticated equipment from the west, the US included.

According to figures presented at a recent seminar on acquisitions, former secretary (Defence Finance) Vinod Misra projected spends of $235 billion over the next 10 years or so.

That is more than enough if India wants to keep everyone happy, but the key has to be to build an edge by acquiring the best for the Indian defenders. The Indian soldier has to have the edge even in the best; it is his own life and the security of India that warrant this. And the edge in techno-quality would be the only guarantee to deter a war, or to be able to punish an aggressor effectively.

Let the armed forces decide what is the best, and so be it. If the Indian Air Force and the Indian Navy think that an aircraft like the JSF can give an edge and is also cost-effective, then the government should give it serious consideration.

Gulshan Luthra is a senior defence analyst at India Strategic

Source: Indo-Asia News Service

Related Links
-
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries



And it's 3... 2... 1... blastoff! Discover the thrill of a real-life rocket launch.



.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



MILPLEX
US senators seek sanctions on Russian firm
Washington (IANS) Mar 13, 2012
A group of 17 US senators have urged the defence department to stop doing business with a Russian state-owned arms exporting company, which they accused of supplying arms to Syria. In a letter to Defence Secretary Leon Panetta Monday, the senators said the Rosoboronexport company of Russia sold 36 fighter jets to Syria in January, in addition to arms sales last year that was worth nearly $ ... read more


MILPLEX
Europe's Arianespace inks new deals at US conference

ILS Announces A New Contract For The ILS Proton Launch Of The Mexsat-1 Satellite

Launch Madness at Wallops in March - "Five in Five"

Engineers Tuck NuSTAR in its Nose Cone

MILPLEX
Rep. Schiff Applauds Decision to Reject NASA Request to Divert Mars Funds

Winter Studies of 'Amboy' Rock Continue

NASA Mars Orbiter Catches Twister in Action

Working models for the gravitational field of Phobos

MILPLEX
Russia sets sights on Moon, Mars and beyond: report

Apollo 11: 'A Stark Beauty All Its Own'

Magnetic moon

Twin GRAIL Spacecraft Begin Collecting Lunar Science Data

MILPLEX
New Horizons on Approach: 22 AU Down, Just 10 to Go

MILPLEX
Stars with Dusty Disks Should Harbor Earth-like Worlds

Star Comb joins quest for Earth-like planets

Researchers say galaxy may swarm with 'nomad planets'

New model provides different take on planetary accretion

MILPLEX
What Next for X-37B

XCOR Aerospace Closes $5 Million Round of Investment Capital

XCOR Announces New Lynx Vehicle Payload Integrators

Future of Space Transportation

MILPLEX
Three for Tiangong

China hopes to send Long March-5 rocket into space in 2014

Upgraded carrier rocket ready for China's first manned space docking

Long March 7 carrier rocket to lift off in five years

MILPLEX
Dear Ups and Dawns

Asteroid 2011 AG5 - A Reality Check

Scientists say big asteroid bears watching


Memory Foam Mattress Review

Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2012 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement