Space Travel News  
Attacking Iran Could Speed Up Nuclear Program

The report suggests air strikes, like those reportedly being considered by the United States and Israel, would harden Iranian attitudes and political resistance to outside pressure to stop uranium enrichment. The Islamic republic would then focus on manufacturing one or two nuclear devices, leading to a nuclear-armed Iran within one or two years, it added. Hans Blix, who headed the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) in Iraq and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), backs the report's assessment. He wrote in the report's foreword: "Armed attacks on Iran would very likely lead to the result they were meant to avoid -- the building of nuclear weapons within a few years."

The report argued that military action would probably result in a high number of civilian casualties, as a surprise attack would inevitably catch many people unawares and unprotected. Air strikes would have to hit many well-protected targets across Iran, including the Kalaye Electric Company, which produces components for gas centrifuges used in uranium enrichment. Other targets would include the Bushehr nuclear reactor, the Arak heavy water reactor and heavy water production plant, uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz, uranium mines at Saghand and the research reactors at Isfahan.

by Staff Writers
London (AFP) Mar 05, 2007
Pre-emptive military strikes on Iran could accelerate rather than hinder Tehran's production of atomic weapons, a report by a British global security think-tank said Monday. Backed by the former chief UN weapons inspector in Iraq, Hans Blix, the Oxford Research Group said Iran could respond to an attack by launching a "crash programme" and build a crude nuclear device within months.

"If Iran is moving towards a nuclear weapons capacity it is doing it relatively slowly, most estimates put it at least five years away," said one of the report's authors, leading British nuclear scientist Frank Barnaby.

"However attacking Iran -- far from setting back their progress towards a bomb -- would almost certainly lead to a fast-track programme to develop a small number of nuclear devices as quickly as possible.

"It would be a bit like deciding to build a car from spare parts instead of building the entire car factory. Put simply, military attacks could speed Iran's progress to a nuclear bomb."

The report suggests air strikes, like those reportedly being considered by the United States and Israel, would harden Iranian attitudes and political resistance to outside pressure to stop uranium enrichment.

The Islamic republic would then focus on manufacturing one or two nuclear devices, leading to a nuclear-armed Iran within one or two years, it added.

Blix, who headed the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) in Iraq and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), backs the report's assessment.

He wrote in the report's foreword: "Armed attacks on Iran would very likely lead to the result they were meant to avoid -- the building of nuclear weapons within a few years."

The report argued that military action would probably result in a high number of civilian casualties, as a surprise attack would inevitably catch many people unawares and unprotected.

Air strikes would have to hit many well-protected targets across Iran, including the Kalaye Electric Company, which produces components for gas centrifuges used in uranium enrichment.

Other targets would include the Bushehr nuclear reactor, the Arak heavy water reactor and heavy water production plant, uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz, uranium mines at Saghand and the research reactors at Isfahan.

But the report said there was a "real possibility" Iran had built secret facilities elsewhere as well as "false targets" in anticipation of air strikes.

"With inadequate intelligence, it is unlikely that it would be possible to identify and subsequently destroy the number of targets needed to set back Iran's nuclear programme for a significant period," it said.

The report suggested that Iran could salvage enough material for a bomb from the reactor at Bushehr after any attack, or turn to the black market, where small amounts of uranium or plutonium would be easy to smuggle.

Alternatively, the Iranians may already set have up clandestine facilities with centrifuges that could escape an attack.

"It is a mistake to believe that Iran can be deterred from attaining a nuclear weapons capability by bombing its facilities," the report said.

"In the aftermath of a military strike, if Iran devoted maximum effort and resources to building one nuclear bomb, it could achieve this in a relatively short amount of time: some months rather than years."

The group's executive director, John Sloboda, said: "This report doesn't get into the rights and wrongs of military strikes. It asks whether they will achieve their objectives...

"The conclusions should be food for thought for even the most hawkish: military strikes against Iran will simply not work. Indeed they could even bring a nuclear-armed Iran closer."

Source: Agence France-Presse

Related Links
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Iran And The US A Delicate Balance Between War And Peace
Moscow (RIA Novosti) Mar 02, 2007
On February 23, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency will deliver a report to the UN Security Council on Iran's compliance with Resolution 1737, adopted last December. The resolution instructed Iran to suspend all uranium enrichment activities by February 21. If the report says that Tehran has ignored these demands, the Security Council will take additional measures to toughen its sanctions.







  • Cornell To Study Planetary Magnetic Fields Propulsion Research Under NASA Grant
  • Aerojet Tests Next Generation Safety Capability
  • NASA Issues Ares I Upper Stage Production Request For Proposal
  • Engine Helps Satellites Blast Off With Less Fuel

  • Russia May Open New Space Launch Site
  • Hyundai To Build First South Korea Launch Pad
  • Construction Of Soyuz Launch Base In French Guiana Begins
  • Satellite Launcher Arianespace Seeks To Boost US Business

  • Space Shuttle Atlantis Rolls Back
  • Fuel To Be Removed From Space Shuttle
  • Space Shuttle Atlantis External Tank Hit By Major Hail Storm On Pad
  • NASA Delays Shuttle Atlantis Launch Due To Hail Damage

  • No Adjustment To ISS Orbit Due To Atlantis Launch Postponement
  • Space Station Safety Report Released
  • ISS Crew Complete Hour Space Walk As Next Shuttle Crew Conduct Dry Countdown
  • Soyuz TMA-10 Spacecraft To Launch Expedition 15 Crew To ISS On April 7

  • Astrophysicist Hawking To Try Out Weightlessness
  • Impossible For Great Wall To Be Visible With Naked Eye From From Space
  • Japanese Instant Noodle Pioneer In Final Blastoff
  • US Space Agency Looks To The Moon And Beyond

  • China To Prioritize Three Areas In Space Program
  • If You Love Me Order Some Purple Space Potatoes
  • China, US Have No Space Cooperation
  • China To Build Fourth Satellite Launching Center In Hainan

  • Learning From Mistakes Next Challenge For Japanese Humanoids
  • Superbots In Action
  • NASA Helps Create A March Madness For Robotics
  • Vivid On-Line Videos Demonstrate SuperBot Progress

  • Rosetta Delivers Phobos Transit Animation And Sees Mars In Stereo
  • SpaceDev's Starsys Division Awarded Contract For NASA Mars Science Explorer Mission
  • Where Is Beagle 2
  • Sensor Being Developed To Check For Life On Mars

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement