Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
  Space Travel News  

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

Indonauts Must Wait For A Better Rocket

India's GSLV fails on launch Dec 10, 201.
by Morris Jones
Sydney, Australia (SPX) Jan 13, 2011
The 2010 Christmas Day failure of India's Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle was a sad blow to India's space program. ISRO, India's space agency, lost a rocket and a major satellite. There's an obvious need to plan a replacement for the lost bird, and debug the problems that caused the failure. Beyond this, there could be further implications. The loss of this rocket will have an influence on India's fledgling human spaceflight program.

India announced plans for a space capsule in 2008, and planning has gone on without much comment ever since. The capsule is a blunt, conical spacecraft with a cylindrical service module. It's designed to carry up to three astronauts. The generically dubbed "orbital vehicle" is designed to be launched by a modified version of the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle, the same rocket that recently failed.

Sadly, this is not the first time that GLSV has failed. Out of a total of seven launches, only two are judged to be complete successes. Four were unquestionable failures (including both of the launch attempts in 2010). One 2007 flight is judged to be a partial failure, placing a satellite in the wrong orbit.

Clearly, ISRO does not plan to simply bolt a spacecraft atop the GLSV as we currently know it and blast an astronaut into space. There will be modifications to the vehicle and testing. But the appalling performance record of the GSLV will complicate attempts to use it for human missions.

The process of certifying a rocket as fit for carrying astronauts is known (with some lingering sexism) as "man rating". Much of this process involves building up a high expectation of reliability, demonstrated in test flights.

Man rating also involves the addition of extra safety systems, such as escape rockets for the crew capsule. There will also be modifications to some regular components to ensure a higher chance of success. Issues such as acceleration levels and the acoustic and vibrational environment also play a part. Clearly, getting a launch vehicle man rated is far more complex than certifying a launch of a satellite.

Man rating is also a subjective process. Reliable figures for the projected failure rates of certain launch vehicles can be difficult to estimate. Sure, there can be test missions and calculations, but these can still be off the mark. The safety levels and risks that managers are prepared to accept are also matters of personal judgment.

India has marked 2016 as a possible target date for its first manned space mission. If ISRO hopes to launch in roughly five years, it will need to produce some miracles of engineering. Building the spacecraft is one thing. This will be complex, but it's probable achievable in the time frame. The greatest challenge of all will be taming the rocket to launch it.

Apart from the rather poor track record of GSLV launches, another problem is at play. The GLSV has gradually evolved over the course of its launches. The most recent GSLV is substantially different from the first.

These changes have been good in principle, and have focused on improving the rocket and phasing in indigenous technology. In practice, the numerous changes make it hard to generate a reliable statistical base for the overall launch campaign. Can earlier launches truly be used to evaluate the reliability of a new model of the rocket?

In some ways, this "apples and oranges" problem makes things look good. Some of the earlier failures can be written off as teething troubles with a new and unevolved prototype. In other ways, it looks even worse.

The failure rate of more advanced versions of the rocket remains high, and the overall statistical base is even smaller. Furthermore, failures seem to happen for different reasons on different launches. This could suggest problems with multiple sub-systems, which further complicates the debugging process.

Man rating the GSLV will require ISRO to settle on a design and test it extensively, demonstrating a good performance record. This will require a lot of work to make the rocket more reliable, and a high flight rate in the years ahead.

At the present, it's not exactly clear how ISRO is planning to deploy the GSLV in the years ahead, but it seems that 2011 will be free of any launches while the recent failures are digested.

Many payloads are earmarked for GSLV launches in 2012 and beyond, with a rough average of four launches per year expected. Any more than three failures in the next five years will seriously compromise faith in this launch system.

Beyond showing that GSLV can be trusted as a satellite launcher, ISRO will need to test the capsule and the modified GSLV that will launch it on several uncrewed test flights. How will these be integrated into the overall launch manifest for the decade ahead? How many flights will be needed? These are unresolved issues.

Ultimately, India may find itself placing the cart before the horse. An Indian space capsule may be ready for action, but the GSLV could still be unfit to launch it.

In such a case, ISRO may wish to compromise by launching its indigenous orbital vehicle atop a foreign rocket. If this path is not taken, and if the GSLV does not prove its worth in the years ahead, then India's astronauts will be waiting for their flights for a very long time.

Dr Morris Jones is an Australian space analyst and writer. Email Replace NOSPAM with @ to send email.

Share This Article With Planet Earth DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook

Related Links
Rocket Science News at Space-Travel.Com

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

Canada says it could build launch rockets
Ottawa (UPI) Jan 3, 2011
Canada, which now relies on other countries to launch its satellites into orbit, has the technological ability to build its own rockets, space experts say. Canada's Defense Department and the Canadian Space Agency are considering the option of constructing a Canadian-made launcher, the Ottawa (Ontario) Citizen reported Monday. "One option currently being evaluated relates to the ... read more

ATM Is Readied For Its February Launch On Ariane 5

ISRO To Launch Two Communication Satellites This Year

Arianespace Will Have A Record Year Of Launch Activity In 2011

2011: The Arianespace Family Takes Shape

Scanning The Red Planet

Mars Desert Research Station 2011 Field Season Begins

Rover Continues To Explore Santa Maria Crater

NASA tries to awaken mars rover

Lunar water may have come from comets - scientists

Moon Has Earth-Like Core

The Hunt For The Lunar Core

Rocket City Space Pioneers Announce Partnership With Solidworks

Mission To Pluto And Beyond Marks 10 Years Since Project Inception

Kuiper Belt Of Many Colors

Reaching The Mid-Mission Milestone On The Way To Pluto

Inclined Orbits Prevail In Exoplanetary Systems

Planet Affects A Star's Spin

Kepler Mission Discovers Its First Rocky Planet

NASA spots tiny Earth-like planet, too hot for life

Indonauts Must Wait For A Better Rocket

Canada says it could build launch rockets

ISRO Scanning Data For GSLV Flop

J-2X Turbomachinery Complete

China Builds Theme Park In Spaceport

Tiangong Space Station Plans Progessing

China-Made Satellite Keeps Remote Areas In Venezuela Connected

Optis Software To Optimize Chinese Satellite Design

NASA Radar Reveals Features on Asteroid

A Look Into Vesta's Interior

Dawn Has A Consistent 2010

Asteroid Itokawa Sample Return

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement