. Space Travel News .

How NASA Solved a 100 Million Dollar Problem for Five Bucks
by Brent Rose for Gizmodo
Cape Canaveral FL (SPX) Feb 02, 2012

File image courtesy AFP.

A few years ago, back when the Constellation Program was still alive, NASA engineers discovered that the Ares I rocket had a crucial flaw, one that could have jeopardized the entire project. They panicked. They plotted. They steeled themselves for the hundreds of millions of dollars it was going to take to make things right.

And then they found out how to fix it for the cost of an extra value meal.

The problem facing Ares 1 wasn't a booster malfunction or a computer glitch. It was simple cause-and-effect physics. During the final stages of a launch, as the solid booster rocket burns down it makes the entire vehicle oscillate rapidly. Add that oscillation to the resonant frequency of the large tube that separates the booster and the crew cabin, and you get a crew capsule that vibrates like crazy.

When humans are vibrating to that extent, it's impossible for them to read a digital display. If the astronauts can't read, they can't do their jobs. If they can't do their jobs, no more mission.

To evaluate the extent of the problem, NASA called in its Human Factors Division. They're the ones who study human perception and performance, from very basic research to very applied research.

In fact, they were the ones who had done the most recent round of vibration tests: 50 years ago, for the Gemini project, back when displays were analog, steam-actuated dials and gauges instead of the computer screens of today. Cockpits, like everything else, have changed a lot since those days. It was time for some new tests.

Step one was to set up a chair so it would vibrate purely in an up-down motion (or in-out, if you're lying on your back like an astronaut would be), which is how the launch vehicle was predicted to shake.

The vibrational frequency of the rocket would be 12 hertz (on average, but it would fluctuate between 10Hz and 13Hz) so they needed something that could hit that range exactly. Luckily, that technology already existed; the same mechanism that causes your chair to shake in simulation rides at amusement park made for a perfect prototype.

The engineers also knew that as Ares I gained speed the shake would increase. They calculated that toward the final stage, when astronauts would be already subjected to 4 G's of acceleration, they would be getting an additional 0.7 G's of vibration. As NASA slowly ramped up testing in the chair, they discovered that at 0.7 G's even the largest numbers on the digitized display were almost entirely illegible.

Houston, we have a major effing problem.

Plans were drawn up to reduce the vibrations. Spring and counter-firing motors. Hundreds of millions of dollars to implement. Added years of development and implementation. A nearly insurmountable setback.

And then the people in the Vibration Lab had a really, really good idea: By simply strobing the display in time with the vibration, they could kill this problem altogether. They bought a handful of circuits that only cost a few bucks, hooked them up to the screen, and set it to strobe at 12Hz. And it worked!

Well, almost.

The readability was vastly improved, but it wasn't perfect. The chair was vibrating at 12Hz and the screen was strobing at 12Hz, but they weren't perfectly in sync. The text was more visible, sure, but it looked like it was swimming around.

NASA could do better. So they grabbed a few accelerometers and attached them to the chair. With the vibration and the strobing now perfectly in sync, the display became crystal clear. And the final cost was a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of what they'd anticipated. Victory.

If it sounds too simple to actually work, believe me, I felt the same way until I saw it with my own eyes during a recent visit to NASA Ames. My guides were only willing to take me up to 0.5 G's, but even at that rate the smallest column of numbers was completely illegible. As soon as they flipped on strobing?

I could see it perfectly. The effect was stunning. We did our best to show the before/after by putting our camera on the sled, but the image-stabilization was just too damn good (well played, Sony. Well played). You'll have to take my word for it.

Because it was also important to know if the system worked while vibrating and feeling the real, face-melting G-forces that astronauts experience, NASA's big brains have incorporated a similar strobing/vibrating rig into the iconic G-force simulation centrifuge. They wouldn't let me anywhere near that thing without all kinds of medical evaluations. Begging, bribery, and tearful theatrics proved ineffective. Maybe someday.

NASA has a patent pending on the technology, although the problems it solves are decidedly not NASA-specific; helicopters, planes, and fast-moving boats have similar vibrational issues, so it's very possible we'll see this implemented elsewhere. I just want to sync my TV up to a shiatsu massage chair. Nobody blurs my Beyonce.

So while the the Ares I rocket has been grounded, there's no question this research will live on and be implemented in NASA's next launch vehicle. It's nice to know that the next generation of astronauts will be able to see what they're doing, and that it didn't cost the tax-payers hundreds of millions of dollars. Good deal.

Related Links
Space Tourism, Space Transport and Space Exploration News

Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries

And it's 3... 2... 1... blastoff! Discover the thrill of a real-life rocket launch.


. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

Report Identifies 16 Highest Priorities to Guide NASA Tech Development
Washington DC (SPX) Feb 02, 2012
During the next five years, NASA technology development efforts should focus on 16 high-priority technologies and their associated top technical challenges, says a new report from the National Research Council. In addition, the report recommends emphasis on flight demonstrations for technologies that are nearly ready and a 10 percent allocation from the existing program budget to advance and ref ... read more

SpaceX flight to ISS could be late March: NASA

Feb 13 set as new date for Europe's Vega rocket

Launch of Proton-M with Dutch Satellite Postponed

First Vega rocket assembled on launch pad

U.K. study: Mars surface too dry for life

Radio Doppler Tracking Continues at Cape York

Russia May Repeat Mars-500 Simulation on Space Station

A dark spot on Mars - Syrtis Major

NASA Mission Returns First Video From Lunar Far Side

A Moon Colony by 2020

U.S. Presidential Hopeful Promises Moon Base by 2020

Moon looms bright over Republican debate

New Horizons Aims to Put Its Stamp on History

New Horizons Works through Winter Wakeup

The Rings of Pluto

Just A Three Year Cruise Left Before Pluto Flyby

Russia to Start Own Search for Extrasolar Planets

Planets Circling Around Twin Suns

New super-Earth detected within the habitable zone of a nearby star

Scientists help define structure of exoplanets

SpaceX Test Fires Engine Prototype for Astronaut Escape System

Armadillo rocket flys high

NASA's J-2X Engine Kicks Off 2012 With Powerpack Testing

ATK Completes Third Space Act Agreement Milestone for Liberty under NASA's Commercial Crew Program

China's satellite navigation sector annual output predicted to reach 35 bln USD in 2015

China plans to launch 21 rockets, 30 satellites this year

Shenzhou 9 Behind the Curtain

China Plans to Launch 30 Satellites in 2012

Vesta Science Program Continues At Low-altitude Mapping Orbit

Bus-sized asteroid shaves by Earth

Rice lab mimics Jupiter's Trojan asteroids inside a single atom

Vesta Likely Cold and Dark Enough for Ice


The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2012 - Space Media Network. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement