Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
  Space Travel News  

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

40 years on, deniers insist moon landing was in Arizona

by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) July 12, 2009
Forty years after Neil Armstrong became the first man to walk on the moon, there are still those who insist that his giant leap for mankind happened on a film set in Arizona, not on the lunar surface.

The deniers insist that NASA went to extraordinary lengths and great expense to stage a moon landing in a film studio because it wanted to distract a public weary of the Vietnam war, or felt it had to beat the Soviet Union in the space race but feared it didn't have the technology.

Or maybe the US space agency headed to the studio because it was cheaper and less risky than flying to the moon, the deniers have also said.

They put forward thoeries -- like the astronauts would have been fried by radiation when they passed through the Van Allen belts on their way to the moon -- to back up their claims that a moon shot in 1969 would have been impossible.

Most of the deniers were tipped into the realm of lunar landing disbelief after seeing photos of Armstrong and Aldrin on the moon -- or on a set somewhere, as they would insist --, astronomer Phil Plait said on the SETI Institute's "Are We Alone" radio program this week.

The first thing they tend to notice is the starless sky, Plait said on the radio show which is hosted by Seth Shostak, senior astronomer at SETI, a nonprofit based in California that aims to explain the origin and nature of life in the universe.

"There's no atmosphere on the moon, so you would expect the stars to be brighter," Plait said.

But even photos of the night sky on earth would show no stars unless they were shot with an exposure of several seconds -- which they couldn't be for the moon landing because the pictures of Armstrong and Aldrin were taken when the sun was up, he said.

At the shutterspeeds the astronauts would have used, "you just don't see stars, whether you're on earth or on the moon," Plait said.

The deniers also point out that the American flag shown in video footage of the lunar landing flutters -- even though there's no air on the moon -- and have grips with shadows on the lunar surface.

The negationists fell dormant for several years but resurfaced in 2001 when Fox TV aired a program called "Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?"

The show portrayed NASA as little more than "a blundering movie producer," wrote Dr Tony Phillips on the Science@NASA website.

Lunar landing negationists will probably fade into the background again when the United States returns to the moon, but will they die out entirely? Probably not, said Shostak.

"We'll go back to the moon and find all this hardware and take pictures of it and say, 'Look! Their bootprints!'

"And people who like to think that the US government has nothing better to do than fake a moon landing will say, 'Well, you faked that, too.'"

Share This Article With Planet Earth DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook

Related Links
Mars News and Information at
Lunar Dreams and more

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

Walking on the moon: a singular, solitary experience
Cape Canaveral, Florida (AFP) July 12, 2009
For the man of faith, walking on the moon challenged and redefined his concept of God and creation. For the scientist, it was a once-in-a-lifetime chance to deepen his knowledge. But astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Harrison Schmitt can agree on one thing: mankind has a duty and a responsibility to continue its adventure in space in our solar system and beyond. Aldrin, now 79, landed on the ... read more

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement